November 15, 2004

Institute for Public Accuracy Report


Report from Institute for Public Accuracy:
********************************************************
----- Original Message -----
From: "Institute for Public Accuracy"
To:
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 10:44 AM
Subject: Ohio: Official Recount Now Expected


> Institute for Public Accuracy
> 915 National Press Building, Washington, D.C. 20045
> (202) 347-0020 * http://www.accuracy.org * ipa@accuracy.org
> ___________________________________________________
>
> 1 p.m. ET -- Monday, November 15, 2004
>
> Ohio: Official Recount Now Expected
>
> DAVID COBB, [via Blair Bobier, b2@bobierlaw.com], http://www.votecobb.com
> Cobb was the 2004 presidential candidate for the Green Party. He said
> today: "We announced our intention to seek a recount of the vote in Ohio.
> Since the required fee for a statewide recount is $113,600, the only
> question was whether that money could be raised in time to meet the filing
> deadline. That question has been answered. Thanks to the thousands of
> people who have contributed to this effort, we can say with certainty that
> there will be a recount in Ohio." The Green Party is working with the
> Libertarian Party -- both parties were on the ballot in Ohio -- in
> securing a recount. The presidential candidates for the two parties have
> demanded that Ohio Secretary of State Kenneth Blackwell, a Republican who
> co-chaired this year's Bush campaign in Ohio, recuse himself from the
> recount process.
>
> The media director for the Cobb-LaMarche campaign, Blair Bobier, said
> today: "The Ohio presidential election was marred by numerous press and
> independent reports of mis-marked and discarded ballots, problems with
> electronic voting machines and the targeted disenfranchisement of
> African-American voters. A number of citizens' groups and voting rights
> organizations are holding the second of two hearings today in Columbus,
> Ohio, to take testimony from voters, poll watchers and election experts
> about problems with the Ohio vote. The hearing, from 6 to 9 p.m., will be
> held at the Courthouse, meeting room A, 373 S. High St., in Columbus." For
> more information, see: .
>
> JOHN BONIFAZ, JBonifaz@nvri.org, http://www.nvri.org
> Executive director for the National Voting Rights Institute, Bonifaz is
> the lawyer for the recount effort. He said today: "We must ensure that all
> votes are properly counted."
>
> JONATHAN TURLEY, jturley@law.gwu.edu, http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6452480
> Turley is a professor of constitutional law at George Washington
> University; he is not connected to the recount efforts. Turley said today:
> "Electors are certified on Dec. 7. They actually vote on Dec. 13. But
> those votes are not opened by Congress until Jan. 6. So there is still
> time to challenge the results in Ohio -- as well as other close states
> such as New Mexico, Iowa and Nevada."
>
> Turley added: "I was surprised on the morning after the election. I was
> legal analyst with CBS News for the election and we did not go off the air
> until 6 a.m. At that time, due to the reports and my conversation with
> Kerry attorneys, I expected a challenge. Kerry's statement the day after
> the election that there were not enough provisional ballots to have any
> chance to alter the result of the election may have been true, but it was
> a bit misleading since provisional ballots are only part of the story.
> There were also absentee ballots, there were reports of substantial
> pockets of election problems, and allegations of over-voting and machine
> malfunction. In addition, over 70 percent of Ohio's votes were done with
> punch cards. We know that when you do a challenge to those, they tend to
> turn over. So there is room to challenge Ohio and other states. This is
> not to say that a recount is likely to change the result of the election,
> but it is not an impossibility."
>
> For more information, contact at the Institute for Public Accuracy:
> Sam Husseini, (202) 347-0020; or David Zupan, (541) 484-9167
>
> ***********
> http://lists.accuracy.org/lists/info/public

No comments:

Post a Comment

Please keep comments dignified and worthy of the important issues we are discussing.

1.No comment spam.
2.No profanity.
3.No trolls masquerading as something else.
4.No unsupported accusations.
5.No defamation.
6.No threats.
7.No unsupported accusations.
8. No legal advice, pseudo-legal advice, or misleading statements of law, or false statements of fact.
9. Comments must be related to topic of the post.
10. Nothing to detract from the dignity of "Ohio Election Fraud" as a forum for the discussion of very important issues.
11. If you are "Anonymous" you must provide a "handle" in your comment so we can differentiate one Anonymous from another.
Thanks.
-R.B.