The Ohio Supreme Court judge hearing the election contest case has refused to order election officials to preserve evidence, refused to remove himself from the case, and called the papers "woefully inadequate".
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=694&e=1&u=/
ap/20041230/ap_on_el_pr/ohio_vote_challenge
Before the Ohio Election Fraud, this blog was entitled "Fairness". Since November 2, 2004, a day that will live in infamy, this blog has been devoted exclusively to fighting the crimes committed against the citizens of Ohio, and against our American way of life, in the 2004 "election".
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please keep comments dignified and worthy of the important issues we are discussing.
1.No comment spam.
2.No profanity.
3.No trolls masquerading as something else.
4.No unsupported accusations.
5.No defamation.
6.No threats.
7.No unsupported accusations.
8. No legal advice, pseudo-legal advice, or misleading statements of law, or false statements of fact.
9. Comments must be related to topic of the post.
10. Nothing to detract from the dignity of "Ohio Election Fraud" as a forum for the discussion of very important issues.
11. If you are "Anonymous" you must provide a "handle" in your comment so we can differentiate one Anonymous from another.
Thanks.
-R.B.