July 06, 2006

Greene County 2004 Recount Irregularities Detailed Under Oath by Recount Worker

In a 4-page declaration under penalty of perjury, Ohio 2004 recount observer Evelyn Roberson -- a retired election official from California -- has detailed irregularities in the conduct of the recount in Greene County, Ohio, including
-operation of, and "clearance" of, the tabulators prior to the recount observers's arrival, by Brett Rapp, president of Triad, the manufacturer of the tabulators;
-non-random selection of the precincts to be recounted;
-leaving the ballots in stacks on a table rather than in sealed containers, as required by Ohio law;
-seating of the observers so that they could not see the ballot punches;
-the failure of the 'readers' and the 'markers' to be looking at the same ballot at the same time;
-the absence of any display of the sample ballot;
-the failure to show the observers the sheets in which entries were being made;
-the failure to place the punched cards against a colored background to enable the observers to have a clear view of the holes;
-the failure to conduct a full hand recount after a discrepancy did materialize;
-handing the ballots to Mr. Rapp for a machine count;
-the officials directing the observers to leave the building during a lunch break, and then during that 'lunch break' starting a machine recount without the observers present, when a hand recount was mandated by law in any event;
-storage of the ballots in bags, rather than boxes; and
-exclusive control over the machines by an unauthorized person, the Triad representative.

A copy of Ms. Roberson's declaration has been posted at http://ohioelection2004.com/PDFHost/041231roberson.pdf

No comments:

Post a Comment

Please keep comments dignified and worthy of the important issues we are discussing.

1.No comment spam.
2.No profanity.
3.No trolls masquerading as something else.
4.No unsupported accusations.
5.No defamation.
6.No threats.
7.No unsupported accusations.
8. No legal advice, pseudo-legal advice, or misleading statements of law, or false statements of fact.
9. Comments must be related to topic of the post.
10. Nothing to detract from the dignity of "Ohio Election Fraud" as a forum for the discussion of very important issues.
11. If you are "Anonymous" you must provide a "handle" in your comment so we can differentiate one Anonymous from another.
Thanks.
-R.B.